a:5:{s:8:"template";s:56111:" {{ keyword }}

Posted on 13/03/2023 at 3:36 am by / {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 36 }}

{{ keyword }}About Author

{{ keyword }}Leave a reply {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 42 }}

";s:4:"text";s:14752:"Most of my serious stuff I would not use 35mm for. Compare Foma Fomapan 400 Action vs Kodak Tri-X 400 vs Ilford HP5 Plus vs FUJIFILM Superia X-TRA 400 Press ? Happy shooting! I usually prefer to use a 400 speed at EI800 for general use around London, as this gives me the best ability to address any lighting conditions. Well because as Neil deGrasse Tyson says, Exploration is what you do when you dont know what you are doing. I see this as a good film for those who want to photograph historical events like World War Two or similar mid-century conflict reenactment. Id guess the image on the right is Fomapan and vice versa. Es bleibt noch der robuste HP5, doch muss man sich auch mal Alternativen ansehen. als der Silvermax darin ebenso mit guten Ergebnissen entwickeln lassen. Very little shadow detail, but great when you know how to use it. I want to ask a question about developer; What kind of developer was used? I quit shooting Fomapan 400 because it was so scratch prone for me.Also, whats your Plustek workflow like Im thinking of ditching silverfast for vuescan, Im hearing vuescan makes for more neutral images because silverfast always wants to employ negafix profiles and rubbish like that (half the films I shoot dont even have a negafix profile). It provides a grittier look than other Kodak films (specifically T-Max 400). Its predictable, and has a very classic feeling to it. HP5 Plus. It is, I believe, well known that Foma is a go-to choice for relabeled black-and-white film stocks, and evidence suggests that three of FPPs monster films are actually Fomapan 100, 200 and 400 respectively (the fourth appears to be Orwo UN54). I developed both films with rodinol, so a good deal of grain was to be expected. The contrast, larger grain, and character is the best Ive found at this price point. Enter? Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience-, 5 Frames with the Olympus XA & Ektar 100 (at EI400) by Simon King, Frames with the Mighty Hasselblad XPAN By Yul Vazquez, 5 Frames on Frozen Lake Winnipeg with Rollei 25 RPX By Christopf Rampitsch, 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 "Action" at EI1600, Developed as 3200 - by Simon King - 35mmc, First Impressions: A Fomapan 400 Review - The Analogue Experience, Fomapan 400 & Kentmere 400 Review - Battle of the Budgets - by Simon King - 35mmc, Video: Chatting to Ashley Carr in Stourport (part 2), 5 frames of the Extinction Rebellion with a Leica R5 - by Michael Scott, Camera, Lens, Film and Peripheral Kit Reviews, Contribute to 35mmc for an Ad-Free Experience. Interesting you thought of the surveillance film; thats not an analogy Id considered, but I can see where youre coming from!Ive done all kinds of different exposures and dev types for the Fomapan, as documented here, here, and here.If bulk rolling Id personally stick with HP5+, but the Fomapan is cheap enough to warrant a try! The images more often than not remind of me Tri-X at box speed that prevailing grey-tone is distinct. dringend abraten kann ich vom Foma400 in Rodinal. I think that overexposed by a stop it definitely shares characteristics, there is some equivalency between the rendering of the grain, and the achievable contrast in flat light. Fomapan 400 does well with Fomadon LQN and pretty good with HC-110 in my experience. Hi Simon,thanks for the comparison. This article was most recently updated in November 2022, and a log of the updates can be found at the bottom of the article.). Bisher ging ich eher von ASA 320 aus. Fomapan 400 @ 1600 Fomapan 400 @ 1600 This roll of Fomapan 400 was exposed EI1600 and developed at a +2 stop push. Both films are a solid choice - try both and see which you like better! Great shots, Simon!Like the Fomapan better in this sample, but obviously its a matter of tase. HP5+ is an exemplary film, and definitely worth the extra cost. I Theres never a bad time to go out and shoot some film. Definitely a characterful film with quirks, and requiring experimentation before a user can be comfortable with what it offers. document.getElementById("ak_js_1").setAttribute("value",(new Date()).getTime()); This site uses Akismet to reduce spam. I guess that having used it for so long is also a factor, but I have a lot of confidence in Kentmere 400. "Never criticize someone until you've walked a mile in their shoes. Kentmere 400, metered for the mid-tone. Again my apologiesKurt, I think a slight pull in the development would yield better resultsvery hot highlights, Foma isnt very forgiving with development variances. Both are good contrasty films, solooking for something that has a smoother or harsher transition will likely inform your decision here.if(typeof ez_ad_units!='undefined'){ez_ad_units.push([[300,250],'35mmc_com-banner-1','ezslot_14',185,'0','0'])};__ez_fad_position('div-gpt-ad-35mmc_com-banner-1-0'); Grain is an interesting one, as different developers will offer different granular results. Thanks Matthias! Im not an authority on development my interest lies in the shooting experience, and for me this ends when the shutter is pressed. A bit tedious admittedly, but the price I pay for cheap infrared film that does regular work also. Also, Fomapan 400 is a film that shines in certain situations and conditions and if youre looking for a specific look and feel to your black & white images. Enter? Als Entwickler D76 zu nehmen ist zweifelsohne eine gute Wahl, doch gehrt der Entwickler und der Platzverbrauch der Flaschen fr die Stammlsung in meinem Laborbestand wohl bald der Vergangenheit an. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. Not being concerned with grain and underexposure, I didnt mind it. Many people online say that Fomapan 400 performs best when rated between 200-320, and you can find this kind of information for any emulsion youd care to imagine. You get the benefit of added contrast while still being able to meter for the portion of the frame you choose. It has more highlight bleed and halation than Kentmere, but this is rarely overwhelming in the way it may be on something like Cinestill 800t. Noticeable halation. Honestly, if money is that big an object or is the sole criteria, then just steal TMY2 or TriX. While the pricing advantage of Fomapan has eroded recently due to inflation and other factors, its still usually my go-to when film-testing recently repaired cameras, and even the modest price savings from using it might help encourage experimentation and creative exploration that higher-priced films inherently rather discourage. As a truer native 400 speed film it is more practical for someone looking to get the best results at a higher speed. If thats the look youre going for, it may satisfy you, but I personally prefer Ilford Delta 100 for 35mm photography, and in terms of classic style emulsions, I even find that I prefer Kentmere 100 in 35mm to Fomapan. I personally have a love/hate relationship with Tri-X because no matter what I do, the grain is always hit or miss when scanning. Zu teuer ist er auch nicht: im 10er-Pack 4,39 bei Fotoimpex. However I think because of the grain structure I often perceive the Fomapan to have a little bit of an edge in sharpness. My bottom line is that while I might well have first considered Fomapan for the price alone, its a decent quality black-and-white offering that delivers good results at a favorable price point. https://emulsive.org/reviews/film-review-fomapan-400-arista-edu-ultra-400, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/7822-REG/B_W_65072240_39mm_Infrared_Dark_Red.html, https://www.bhphotovideo.com/c/product/23077-REG/Hoya_B55RM72_55mm_R72_Infrared_Glass.html. This allows me to worry less about temperature, and I sort of just let things sort themselves out in the tank with as little agitation as necessary. Fomapan 400 can also be used for street work in dull conditions or in areas where you want to show off a bit more crunch to go with urban decay. You know what they basically said? Film Comparison: Kentmere 400 Vs Fomapan 400. Content contributor - become a part of the worlds biggest film and alternative photography community blog. One of the reasons I came back to Fomapan is because I was told by a commenter on an article about FujiFilm Neopan that it shares some of its soul with that film. 35mmc is a blog authored, edited and published by Hamish Gill featuring daily articles submitted by readers. und das, obwohl sie weder Ahnung von Fotografie noch von Chemie hat). This article started as a write up about my time shooting these two emulsions over a long bank holiday weekend, where I had similar lighting conditions and was able to shoot similar exposures across both Fomapan and Kentmere rolls. for Aber Rodinal mit ISO 400 geht doch, finde ich. To me, the film seems muddy. Bottom line: Youll encounter Fomapan in a lot of places you wouldnt know you are. As a winter/autumn all rounder the Kentmere is serving me well, and Fomapan as a high-light film makes a lot of sense. Get a free Kentmere 35mm film when you use my invite link!http://i.refs.cc/r7yZ7EEe In this video I shoot my first roll of Fomapan 400 Black and White Excellent work and write up Simon, i have the exact results from the two films (using HC110). That way, you're a mile away and you've got their shoes.". Clocking in at $5.19 a roll for 36 exposures as of October 2021, this is the lest expensive film I shot for this comparison. Maybe it likes really high contrast scenes to begin with.though in 120 it is a nice film as the grain just isn't so noticeable. Both are unique and can not replace the other. in Compard R09 Spezial. Hopefully the results above prove me right. Der 100/21 Silvermax in Silvermax Entwickler entspricht genau dem was ich suchte. Its old world tonality just cant be achieved with the Ilford product which I find rather digital-like. Some people love them; others cant stand them. Thanks! Update: May 26, 2021Added a notation that the Fomapan data sheets indicate that the anti-halation dye clears during development, but that it has not been my experience that it does. Sometimes this grittiness fits your subject - Ill often choose Tri-X when shooting at former military bases because of the grain alone. There are some real good fotos inside. However I really wanted to get better negatives. Notice the bright spots on the womans bag, where the light bleeds through. The only concession I made to scientific method was shooting them both on the same day, so there were similar lighting conditions. They werent having any of that artsy stuff. Your link has been automatically embedded. Vor Korn habe ich keine Angst, solange kein 80 Schleifpapier Look entsteht. I recently wrote a 5 Frames With Fomapan 400 where I described the results shot at EI1600 with a 2 stop push. You can post now and register later. 5 Reasons Why You Should Try Fomapan 200. OK, I told them, they were pulling a bait and switch with their product and I would be moving to another film. If you want some quality on iso 1600 with a iso 400 film use the HP5+ or films like delta 3200 or Tmax 3200 on iso 1600. The grain is fairly fine. Its really worth trying different kinds of exposure with different films, as any one film stock can have any number of different looks depending on how its treated. And many of us are looking for ways to shave a few bucks off the cost of our favorite hobby. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. Its not a popular developer for some reason but its cheap as chips and delivers a fine grain. DIE Reportagekombi der 60er und 70er. And to those who want to shoot it at ASA-400 or even faster, I say go for it! And I thought taping over the red dot was silly. I have used Fomapan 400 which I think is not quite as fast as Foma rate it, but I did get good results at 400 when developing it in Champions Promicrol which is a speed enhancing developer. I like this film for his wide gray scale. If you prefer yourself, it is possibble to give formula? Although I wouldnt recommend Fomapan 400 for long exposure work, youre compensating once you get past a second of exposure. If youre a fan of a particular era of films and love that high-speed crunch and grain that youd find in a 1970s roll of Kodak Tri-X and are okay with a bit of speed loss or an increase of grain plus a bit of soft mush and a mid-to-low contrast than Fomapan 400 might be a film to try. Kentmere is better in general, more dynamic range. Kentmere seems to be accurately rated at 400, and Ive never been inclined to shoot it over/under, or even to push or pull it. I take my results at 400 and, more often than not, am happy with them. Fomapan on the other hand seems underexposed when shot at box speed. If excessive grain is not disturbing you for the Fomapan 400 you can go for Rodinal. Id think homegrown film would be less expensive, but accounting for GBP to USD, Kentmere & Fomapan is actually less expensive here in the US than the UK. Shadow detail is close to non-existent in these situations, but I am usually happier with the look of these images. I love Kentmete films for when I need to test a camera, lens, etc. Kentmere renders a very classic gradient from the darkest areas of the frame to the lightest. Also, I will not be doing anything I consider to be "my work." Thanks for visitingBeyond the Aperture. You may like the results. These days Im only really developing my own film when I have certain requirements, like push processing, otherwise I wait until I have a large batch to send off to AG in Birmingham. FWIW, I develop at home using HC-110 and Rodinal. News, Tips & Reviews. Thank you Victor! However I think there are some quite distinguished features to the grains of these films that should remain constant regardless of the technique used. Fibonawak 8 mo. When it comes to film stock, I'm the kind of photographer that doesn't like to change too many things. mit Bewegung ging es dann immer zu schnell und das Korn war zurck. August 27, 2018. by twhittlesea. Wie ist der Fomapan qualitativ einzuordnen und wie wirkt er in Rodinal? If I wanted that I'd use a softar filter. Learn how your comment data is processed. There are definitely shared characteristics in the results of these films, but I think its more like that Fomapan 400 is a cubic grained film. I'm open to any dispute. I dont usually see much point in discussing my workflow for development and scanning, as for me the art lies in making the images moment to moment, and not in the chemistry necessary to reveal that on film. Fomapan 400 is the fastest emulsion in Foma Bohemias line of films. Another suggestion would be to shoot Kentmere 400 at box speed, but through a yellow or orange filter to boost the contrast. ";s:7:"keyword";s:18:"fomapan 400 vs hp5";s:5:"links";s:441:"Tiana Alexandra Height, Curl Of Gradient Is Zero Proof Index Notation, Joyonway Bluetooth Pairing, Articles F
";s:7:"expired";i:-1;}

{{ keyword }}Appearance > Menus

{{ keyword }}{{ keyword }}

{{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 35 }}

{{ keyword }}

{{ keyword }}About Author

{{ keyword }}

{{ keyword }}Leave a reply {{ KEYWORDBYINDEX 42 }}